Skip to main content

Madison McDowell

Title: Visiting Lecturer

Department: Criminal Justice

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Criminal Justice
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Criminal Justice

Current Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 2100.001Crime and Justice in the United StatesSpring 2025
CJUS 2100.401Crime and Justice in the United StatesSpring 2025
CJUS 4901.401Criminal Justice Capstone ExperienceSpring 2025
CJUS 3600.001Criminology. 3600. CriminologySpring 2025
CJUS 2400.001Correctional SystemsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 2100.002Crime and Justice in the United StatesFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4901.401Criminal Justice Capstone ExperienceFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3900.400Research Methods in Criminal JusticeFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 2100.001Crime and Justice in the United StatesSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 2100.901Crime and Justice in the United StatesSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3340.900Computer CrimeFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3610.001Juvenile JusticeFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3700.900Ethical Issues in Criminal JusticeSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3310.900Organized and Consensual CrimeSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3400.900Correctional SystemsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 2100.900Crime and Justice in the United StatesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 2100.901Crime and Justice in the United StatesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4350.900Seminar on ViolenceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE