Skip to main content

Misty Mikuls-Alloy

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Biological Sciences

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, San Francisco State University, 2023
    Major: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 2700.001Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologySpring 2026
ANTH 2700.100Introduction to Physical AnthropologySpring 2026
ANTH 2700.700Introduction to Physical AnthropologySpring 8W1 2026
BIOL 2700.001Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologyFall 2025 Syllabus
ANTH 2700.001Introduction to Physical AnthropologyFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 2700.001Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 2700.100Introduction to Physical AnthropologySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 2700.001Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 2700.301Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 2700.302Human Evolution and Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 2700.001Introduction to Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 2700.301Introduction to Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 2700.302Introduction to Physical AnthropologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE