Skip to main content

Madalyn Worley

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Social Work

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MSW, University of Texas at Arlington, 2016
    Major: Social Work

Current Scheduled Teaching

SOWK 4540.400Human Diversity for the Helping ProfessionsSpring 2026
SOWK 1450.001Introduction to Social WorkSpring 2026
SOWK 4610.001Social Work Practice IIISpring 2026
SOWK 3500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment IFall 2025 Syllabus
SOWK 4540.400Human Diversity for the Helping ProfessionsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SOWK 3500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment ISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4540.400Human Diversity for the Helping ProfessionsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 3500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 5210.001Practice with Organizations and CommunitiesFall 2024 SPOT
SOWK 4500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 5333.001Social Work Advanced Policy AnalysisSpring 2024 SPOT
SOWK 5333.891Social Work Advanced Policy AnalysisSpring 2024 SPOT
SOWK 4500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE