Skip to main content

Maurice Moss

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2013
    Major: English
    Specialization: Technical Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.414Technical WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
TECM 2700.440Technical WritingSpring 8W2 2025 Syllabus
TECM 2700.441Technical WritingSpring 8W2 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.413Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.432Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.312Technical WritingSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.315Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.400Technical WritingSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.300Technical WritingFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
TECM 2700.813Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.310Technical WritingSpring 2023 SPOT
TECM 2700.311Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.400Technical WritingSpring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.300Technical WritingFall 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.817Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.318Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4250.002Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsSpring 2020 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE