Skip to main content

Leo Moradi

Title: Lecturer

Department: Political Science

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Boston University, 2025
    Major: Political Science
    Dissertation: "Alfarabi's Political Thought in His Parallel Works: Enumeration of the Sciences, Book of Religion, Political Regime, and Virtuous City"
  • MA, Central European University, 2018
    Major: Political Science
  • MA, Radboud Universiteit, 2017
    Major: Political Philosophy
  • MA, University of Qom, 2013
    Major: Ethics - Moral Philosophy

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSCI 2305.003US Political Behavior and PolicySpring 2026
PSCI 2305.004US Political Behavior and PolicySpring 2026
PSCI 2305.401US Political Behavior and PolicySpring 8W1 2026
PSCI 2306.002US and Texas Constitutions and InstitutionsFall 2025 Syllabus
PSCI 2306.007US and Texas Constitutions and InstitutionsFall 2025 Syllabus
PSCI 2306.401US and Texas Constitutions and InstitutionsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE