Skip to main content

Megan Marshall

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Art Foundations

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, Texas Christian University, 2024
    Major: Studio Art

Current Scheduled Teaching

ASTU 2802.501Beginning Sculpture: Digital MethodsFall 2026 Syllabus
ART 1600.210Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2026
ASTU 3803.501Intermediate Sculpture: Installation ArtFall 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 1600.202Foundations: Perception and TranslationSpring 2026 SPOT
ART 1600.203Foundations: Perception and TranslationSpring 2026 SPOT
ART 1600.102Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2025 SPOT
ART 1600.103Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2025 SPOT
ART 1600.208Foundations: Perception and TranslationSpring 2025 SPOT
ART 1600.209Foundations: Perception and TranslationSpring 2025 SPOT
ART 1700.207Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2024 SPOT
ART 1700.208Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2024 SPOT
ART 1700.215Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE