Skip to main content

Melika Rostami

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Data Science

College: College of Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Analytics

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Texas at Dallas, 2016
    Major: Supply Chain Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4707.401Data Modeling and Data WarehousingSummer 10W 2026 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4707.401Data Modeling and Data WarehousingSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4707.401Data Modeling and Data WarehousingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4707.401Data Modeling and Data WarehousingSummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4707.401Data Modeling and Data WarehousingSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Rostami, M., Hossain, T., Hawamdeh, S.M. (2024). 2025 IEEE/ACM Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE).

    • Journal Article

  • Rostami, M., Hawamdeh, S.M. (2025). Debunk Lists as External Knowledge Structures for Health Misinformation Detection with Generative AI.. Systems. 13 (10) 882. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/10/882
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE