Skip to main content

Mark Eastin

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Dean's Office

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BS, University of Arkansas, 1985
    Major: Music Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4148.771Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.771Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.771Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.771Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Fall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.772Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.772Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.772Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.772Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.772Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.772Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE