Skip to main content

Mo-How Shen

Title: Professor

Department: Mechanical Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Michigan, 1989
    Major: Aerospace Engineering
    Dissertation: Natural Modes of Cracked Beams And Identification of Cracks

Current Scheduled Teaching

MEEN 4170.001Advanced Solid MechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus
MEEN 5410.001Advanced Solid MechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus
MEEN 5940.001Graduate Seminar in Mechanical and Energy EngineeringFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MEEN 5800.042Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical EngineeringSpring 2024 SPOT
MEEN 5800.042Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical EngineeringSpring 2023 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Shen, M.H. (Principal), Siller Carrillo, H.R. (Co-Principal), "High-throughput Screening and Quality Assessment Testing and an AI-based In-Situ Process Monitoring and Quality Control Framework for Additive Manufacturing New Builds and Repaired Parts," sponsored by DOD, Federal, $800000 Funded. (2023 - 2027).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE