Skip to main content

Mary Shuma Rudberg

Title: Lecturer

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 3100.900Disability and SocietySummer 10W 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 5724.900Disability and the Family SystemSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
RHAB 3100.810Disability and SocietySpring 3W1 2023 SPOT
RHAB 3100.900Disability and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 5741.900Employment and Career DevelopmentSpring 2023 SPOT
RHAB 4700.900Employment ServicesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 5730.901Medical and Psychosocial Aspects of DisabilitySpring 2023 SPOT
RHAB 4700.900Employment ServicesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 5723.900Group Work and the Rehabilitation ProcessFall 2022 SPOT
RHAB 3000.910MicrocounselingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 5710.900Multicultural Rehabilitation Counseling PracticeFall 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE