Skip to main content

Narayan Aryal

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1180.130College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1720.111Calculus IISpring 2024 SPOT
MATH 1720.112Calculus IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.121Calculus IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.132Pre CalculusFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.310Pre CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.120AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.121AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1100.122AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1100.123AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1710.111Calculus ISummer 5W1 2022 SPOT
MATH 1710.112Calculus ISummer 5W1 2022 SPOT
MATH 1100.120AlgebraSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.121AlgebraSpring 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1100.122AlgebraSpring 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1100.123AlgebraSpring 2022 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Iaia, J.A., Aryal, N. (2024). Existence of Two Infinite Families of Solutions to Singular Superlinear Equation on Exterior Domains. Electronic Journal of the Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations. 68
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE