Skip to main content

Nathan A. Dalaklis

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1650.140Pre CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1650.141Pre CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1650.142Pre CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1650.143Pre CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1680.110Elementary Probability and StatisticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.111Elementary Probability and StatisticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.112Elementary Probability and StatisticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.113Elementary Probability and StatisticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1780.002Probability ModelsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.002Business CalculusSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus
MATH 1710.200Calculus ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.008Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.001Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSummer 5W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.002Business CalculusSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.002Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.001Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Kawamura, K., Dalaklis, N., Mathis , T., Paizanis , M. (2023). The partial derivative of Okamoto's functions with respect to the parametor. Real Analysis Exchange. 48 (1) pp 1-14.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE