Skip to main content

Nosayaba Evbuomwan

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mechanical Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, City University London, 1995
    Major: Mechanical Engineering
  • MSc, Imperial College of Science & Technology, 1988
    Major: Concrete Structures
    Specialization: Concrete Structures
  • BS, University of Benin, 1983
    Major: Civil Engineering
    Specialization: Civil/Structural Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

CNET 3190.001Construction SchedulingSpring 2025
CNET 3190.101Construction SchedulingSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CNET 3190.001Construction SchedulingSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CNET 3190.101Construction SchedulingSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MSET 5260.001Integrative Construction ManagementSpring 2018 SPOT
CNET 4180.002Problems in Project ManagementSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MSET 5900.604Special ProblemsSpring 2018
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE