Skip to main content

Natália Heringer Mendonça

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Sociology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

SOCI 4240.400Sociology of SexualitySpring 2025
SOCI 1510.400Introduction to SociologyFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Heringer Mendonça, N. (2023). O acesso das mulheres trans às leis Maria da Penha e do Feminicídio: uma disputa simbólica, política e epistemológica. [The access of trans women to the Maria da Penha and Feminicide laws: a symbolic, political and epistemological dispute]. Revista Cocar. 18 (36) 20. Belém, State University of Pará. https://periodicos.uepa.br/index.php/cocar/article/view/5700
  • Heringer Mendonça, N. (2023). Da Epistemologia Ao Pragmatismo Sociológico: Por Uma Avaliação Da Produção de Conhecimento." [From epistemology to sociological pragmatism: towards an assessment of knowledge production]. Revista de Instrumentos, Modelos e Políticas em Avaliação Educacional. 3 (3) 16. Fortaleza, State University of Ceará. https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/impa/article/view/9161
  • Heringer Mendonça, N. (2023). Moderation and Coexistence with Psychoactive Substances Use: Approaching a Drug Consumption Room in France. Anuário Antropológico. 48 (1) 238-248. Brasília, University of Brasília. https://journals.openedition.org/aa/10691
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE