Skip to main content

Nicole M. Park

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Special Education - Mild/Moderate Disabilities
    Dissertation: Survey of Texas Secondary Transition and Employment Designees' Use of Evidence-Based Practices
  • MA, Northwest University, 2005
    Major: Counseling Psychology
  • BA, Vanguard University, 1993
    Major: Political Science & History

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDSP 4350.002Disability as Diversity: Inclusive Pedagogies and Practices for Children and Youth with DisabilitiesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 4350.501Disability as Diversity: Inclusive Pedagogies and Practices for Children and Youth with DisabilitiesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3240.030Family Collaboration for Exceptional LearnersFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3240.030Family Collaboration for Exceptional LearnersSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3240.030Family Collaboration for Exceptional LearnersSpring 2020
EDSP 4360.002Transition Education and Services for Exceptional LearnersSummer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE