Skip to main content

Natalie Boyd

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MBA, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: Business Management
  • BBA, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Real Estate
    Specialization: Residential Property Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 3200.003Professional Development IIIFall 2024 Syllabus
BUSI 3200.004Professional Development IIIFall 2024 Syllabus
BUSI 3200.503Professional Development IIIFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 3200.002Professional Development IIISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.003Professional Development IIISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.502Professional Development IIISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.003Professional Development IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.004Professional Development IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.502Professional Development IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.503Professional Development IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.002Professional Development IIISpring 2023 Syllabus
BUSI 3200.003Professional Development IIISpring 2023 Syllabus
BUSI 3200.004Professional Development IIISpring 2023 Syllabus
BUSI 3200.001Professional Development IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.003Professional Development IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
REAL 2100.001Principles of Real EstateSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 2770.001Personal FinanceFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
REAL 2100.002Principles of Real EstateSpring 2020 Syllabus
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE