Skip to main content

Nayana Pampapura Madali

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5737.002Information and Cyber SecurityFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5307.002Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 4745.001Information ArchitectureSummer 10W 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5745.001Information ArchitectureSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
INFO 5737.003Information and Cyber SecuritySpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5737.002Information and Cyber SecurityFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5307.002Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4745.001Information ArchitectureSummer 10W 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Pampapura, N.M., Alsaid, M., Hawamdeh, S.M. (2022). Social Media and People Perception of Global Warming During Critical Environmental Events: the Impact of Misinformation through the Lens of Social Noise. Proceedings 17th International Conference on Knowledge Management, Potsdam 23-24 June 2022. Denton, UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2026753/

    • Journal Article

  • Pampapura, N.M., Alsaid, M., Hawamdeh, S.M. (2023). SOCIAL NOISE ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND USERS PERCEPTION OF GLOBAL WARMING. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. 22 (6) World Scientific.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE