Skip to main content

Nicole P. Foran

Title: Chair

Department: Studio Art

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, University of Cincinnati, 2008
    Major: Fine Arts - Art
  • BFA, University of Saskatchewan, 2005
    Major: Fine/Studio Arts General

Current Scheduled Teaching

ART 4450.719Professional InternshipFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ASTU 3201.503Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Rotating TopicsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipSpring 2024 Syllabus
ASTU 3201.501Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Rotating TopicsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipFall 2023 SPOT
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipSummer 10W 2023
ART 4450.720Professional InternshipSummer 5W2 2023
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipSpring 2023 SPOT
ASTU 5010.002Professional Practices for the Studio ArtistSpring 2023 SPOT
ASTU 3201.503Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Rotating TopicsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipFall 2022
ART 5700.501Seminar in University Art TeachingFall 2022
ASTU 3201.501Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Rotating TopicsSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipSpring 2022
ASTU 5010.001Professional Practices for the Studio ArtistSpring 2022 SPOT
ART 5700.501Seminar in University Art TeachingSpring 2022
ART 4450.719Professional InternshipFall 2021
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Artistic Material/Creative Activity

  • Foran, N.P., Kim, L., Seo, I., Bae, H. (2017). Closing Doors. Other. 2 8-9. Gimpo, CICA Press. https://cicamuseum.com/artist-statement-2-published/
  • Foran, N.P. (2015). Myth. Other. (7) Los Angeles, Antioch University. https://lunchticket.org/myth/
  • Foran, N.P. (2015). The Myth of the Great American Easter Celebration. Other. 2 (1) 5. Harrisonburg, VA, Old Furnace Artist Residency. https://issuu.com/jonhenry5/docs/slagmag5

    • Online Journal Essay

  • Foran, N.P. (2017). Mural Spotting in North Texas. Other. 31 Memphis, TN, Number Inc.. http://www.numberinc.org/mural-spotting-north-texas/

    • Regional Update

  • Foran, N.P. (2018). Regional Update: Middle Tennessee. Other. 93 4. Memphis, TN, Number Incorporated.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

  • Foran, N.P. (Principal), "Access and Diversity Grant," sponsored by Middle Tennessee State University, Other, $2500 Funded. (2019 - 2020).

    • Grant - Research

  • Foran, N.P., "Arts Builds Communities," sponsored by Tennessee Arts Commission, State, $2875 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
  • Foran, N.P., "Visiting Artist Program," sponsored by Bonnaroo Works Fund, Private, $4900 Funded. (2020 - 2020).
  • Foran, N.P. (Principal), "Arts Builds Communities Grant," sponsored by Tennessee Arts Commission, State, $2059.41 Funded. (2019 - 2020).
  • Foran, N.P. (Principal), Satinover, N. (Co-Principal), O'Connell, K. (Supporting), "Middle Tennessee Visiting Artist Program," sponsored by Tennessee Arts Commission, State, $3550 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
  • Foran, N.P. (Principal), "Arts Builds Communities Grant," sponsored by Tennessee Arts Commission, State, $2235.00 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
  • Foran, N.P. (Principal), "EXL Grant," sponsored by Middle Tennessee State University, Other, $829.80 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE