Skip to main content

Nick P. Magera

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 3317.308Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.306Quantitative Methods LabFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.310Quantitative Methods LabFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.303Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.305Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3620.003Developmental PsychologyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.301Quantitative Methods LabSummer 5W1 2022 Syllabus
PSYC 3650.310Experimental MethodsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.308Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.308Quantitative Methods LabFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.309Quantitative Methods LabFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHED 1211.500Intermediate Weight LiftingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHED 1211.501Intermediate Weight LiftingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHED 1211.502Intermediate Weight LiftingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE