Skip to main content

Nga Q. Nguyen

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas Tech University, 2013
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: Finance
  • MBA, Cleveland State University, 2007
    Major: Business Administration
  • BS, Hanoi Academy of Finance,, 2004
    Major: Accounting

Current Scheduled Teaching

FINA 5310.401Advanced Topics in Financial ManagementSpring 2025
FINA 5310.461Advanced Topics in Financial ManagementSpring 2025
FINA 3770.401FinanceSpring 2025
FINA 3770.004FinanceFall 2024 Syllabus
FINA 3770.401FinanceFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

FINA 3770.001FinanceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.002FinanceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 5310.001Advanced Topics in Financial ManagementFall 2023 SPOT
FINA 5310.601Advanced Topics in Financial ManagementFall 2023 SPOT
FINA 3770.006FinanceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4900.001Special ProblemsFall 2023
FINA 3770.004FinanceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.006FinanceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.007FinanceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.009FinanceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.003FinanceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.005FinanceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.002FinanceFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.007FinanceFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.001FinanceSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.007FinanceSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.002FinanceFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.003FinanceFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Nguyen, N., Gillan, S.L. (2024). Shareholder voting on golden parachutes: Effective governance or too little too late?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbfa.12776
  • Nguyen, N., Gillan, S., Nishikawa, T. (2023). Heterogeneity in shareholder activism: Evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 77 Elservier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X2200186X
  • Nguyen, N.Q., Arena, M. (2019). Compensation clawback policies and corporate lawsuits. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 27 (1) 70-85. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-10-2017-0081/full/html
  • Nguyen, N.Q., Doan, T. (2018). Boards of directors and firm leverage: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Journal of Corporate Finance. 51 109-124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119917307344
  • Nguyen, N., Gillan, S.L. (2018). Clawbacks, holdbacks, and CEO contracting. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 30 (1) 53-61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jacf.12277
  • Gillan, S.L., Nguyen, N.Q. (2016). Incentives, termination payments, and CEO contracting. Journal of Corporate Finance. 41 445-465. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84995607519
  • Nguyen, N.Q., Blau, B., Whitby, R. (2015). The distribution of REIT liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Literature. 23 233-252. https://aresjournals.org/doi/abs/10.5555/0927-7544.23.2.233
  • Nguyen, N.Q. (2014). On the compensation and activity of corporate boards. Journal of Corporate Finance. 29 1–19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119914000728
  • Nguyen, N.Q., Blau, B., Whitby, R. (2014). The information content of option ratios. Journal of Banking and Finance. 43 79–187. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842661400106X
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE