Skip to main content

Lola Aneke

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Meredith College, 2012
    Major: Teaching - Special Education (General Curriculum)

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDSP 3210.420Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersSpring 2026
EDSP 3210.420Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDSP 3210.420Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3210.490Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3210.421Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDSP 3210.020Educational Aspects of Exceptional LearnersFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Savage, M.N., Clark, T.A., Baffoe, E., Candelaria, A.E., Aneke, L., Gonzalez, R., Al Enizi, A., Anguita-Otero, M., Edwards-Adams, K., Grandberry, L., Reed, S. (2024). Technology-Based Physical Health Interventions for Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 36 (5) 757-792. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-023-09939-z
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE