Skip to main content

Scott Stovall

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Accounting

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2001
    Major: Accounting
    Dissertation: Accounting for Human Resources: Implications for Theory and Practice
  • MS, University of North Texas, 1988
    Major: Accounting
  • BBA, Harding University, 1985
    Major: Accounting

Current Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 2020.007Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Spring 2025
ACCT 5200.002Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 2025
ACCT 5200.003Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 8W2 2025
ACCT 5130.001Accounting for ManagementFall 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 5130.401Accounting for ManagementFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 5130.402Accounting for ManagementFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 2020.011Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Fall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 5130.501Accounting for ManagementSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 2020.002Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Summer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 2020.007Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5200.002Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5200.003Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
ACCT 5130.004Accounting for ManagementFall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5130.501Accounting for ManagementFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 2020.011Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5130.003Accounting for ManagementSummer 5W2 2023 SPOT
ACCT 2020.002Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Summer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 2020.008Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5200.002Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 2023 SPOT
ACCT 5200.003Professional Ethics and Corporate GovernanceSpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
ACCT 5130.002Accounting for ManagementFall 8W1 2022 SPOT
ACCT 5130.004Accounting for ManagementFall 8W2 2022 SPOT
ACCT 2020.001Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Stovall, O.S., Neill, J.D. (2017). The Ethical Implications of Human Resource Accounting.. Journal of Accounting Ethics and Public Policy. 18 (2) 231-246.
  • Clements, C.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2012). Inherent Conflicts of Interest in the Accounting Profession.. Journal of Applied Business Research. 28 (2) 269-276.
  • Perkins, W.D., Stovall, O.S. (2011). Resource Consumption Accounting - Where Does It Fit?. Journal of Applied Business Research. 27 (5) 41-52.
  • Clements, C.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O. (2010). Cultural Diversity, Country Size, and the IFRS Adoption Decision.. Journal of Applied Business Research. 26 (2) 115-126.
  • Clements, C.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2009). An Analysis of International Accounting Codes of Conduct.. Journal of Business Ethics. 87 (1 Sup) 173-183.
  • Stovall, O.S., Neill, J.D., Reid, B. (2009). Institutional Impediments to Voluntary Ethics Measurement Systems: An International Perspective.. Journal of Applied Business Research. 25 (2) 119-125.
  • Clements, C.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2009). The Impact of Cultural Differences on the Convergence of International Accounting Codes of Ethics.. Journal of Business Ethics. 90 (3 Sup) 383-391.
  • Hoffman, W.M., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2008). An Investigation of Ethics Officer Independence.. Journal of Business Ethics. 78 (1-2) 87-95.
  • Hoffman, W.M., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2008). Mutual Fund Compliance Officer Independence and Corporate Governance.. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 16 (1) 52-60.
  • Stovall, O.S., Neill, J.D., Reid, B. (2006). Institutional Impediments to Voluntary Ethics Measurement Systems.. Journal of Business Ethics. 66 (2-3) 169-175.
  • Fowler, W.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2006). Service Learning and Faith Integration in Accounting.. Christian Business Academy Review.
  • Fowler, W.E., Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2006). Service Learning: A Valuable Experience.. College Teaching and Styles Journal.
  • Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S., Jinkerson, D.L. (2005). A Critical Analysis of the Accounting Industry's Voluntary Code of Conduct.. Journal of Business Ethics. 59 (1-2) 101-108.
  • Perkins, W.D., Stovall, O.S., Fessler, N. (2005). Introducing Simplicity to the Study of Product Costing: The Case of Caprock Cycle Company.. Journal of Accounting Case Research. 8 (2) 16-26.
  • Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2005). Stakeholder Salience and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Three Companies.. Journal of Applied Business Research. 21 (3) 71-78.
  • Stovall, O.S., Neill, J.D., Perkins, W.D. (2004). Corporate Governance, Internal Decision Making, and the Invisible Hand.. Journal of Business Ethics. 51 (2)
  • Neill, J.D., Stovall, O.S., Perkins, W.D. (2003). The Balanced Scorecard: A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective.. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research.
  • Perkins, W.D., Stewart, J.D., Stovall, O.S. (2002). Using Excel, TOC, and ABC to Solve Product Mix Decisions with More Than One Constraint.. Management Accounting Quarterly. Spring 1-10.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE