Skip to main content

Phyllis Clark

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Lamar University, 2015
    Major: Education Technology Leadership

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 340.020Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2023 Syllabus
MATH 340.021Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2023 Syllabus
MATH 340.003Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraSpring 2023 Syllabus
MATH 340.012Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraSpring 2023 Syllabus
MATH 340.001Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 340.006Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 340.011Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1180.120College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.121College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2021 Syllabus
MATH 1180.122College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2021 Syllabus
MATH 1180.123College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2021 Syllabus
MATH 1180.124College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2021 Syllabus
MATH 340.001Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2021
MATH 340.007Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2021
MATH 340.003Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraSpring 2021 Syllabus
MATH 340.001Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraSpring 2020 Syllabus
MATH 340.001Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2019
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE