Faculty Profile

Peter Kipp

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Accounting
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, University of South Florida, 2017.
Major: Business Administration
Degree Specialization: Accounting
BBA, Pittsburg State University, 2012.
Major: Accounting

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 5120.001, Data Analysis in Accounting, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5120.001, Data Analysis in Accounting, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5120.001, Data Analysis in Accounting, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5120.001, Data Analysis in Accounting, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 6940.753, Individual Research, Fall 2020
ACCT 6010.700, Seminar on Advanced Topics in Accounting Research, Summer 5W2 2020
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ACCT 5120.001, Using Information Systems in Accounting, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 6010.700, Seminar on Advanced Topics in Accounting Research, Summer 5W2 2019
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.001, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4100.002, ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Kipp, P., Mathew, J., Sapkota, K., Sapkota, P. (2023). Reporting Cash Tips Income for Income Tax Purposes. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting.
Chang, H. W., Kaszak, S., Kipp, P. C., Robertson, J. C. (2021). The Effect of iXBRL Formatted Financial Statements on the Effectiveness of Managers’ Decisions when Making Inter-Firm Comparisons. Journal of Information Systems. 35(2), 149-177.
Kipp, P. C., Smith, A. L., Zhang, Y. J. Cloud-Computing Risk Disclosure and ICFR Material Weakness: The Moderating Role of Accounting Reporting Complexity. Journal of Information Systems.
Kipp, P. C., Zhang, Y. J., Tadesse, A. F. Can Social Media Interaction and Message Features Influence Nonprofessional Investors' Perceptions of the Firm?. Journal of Information Systems.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE