Skip to main content

Patricia J. Stout

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Art History

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2022
    Major: Visual and Performing Arts

Current Scheduled Teaching

ART 1300.001Art Appreciation for non art majorsSpring 2025
ART 1301.001Honors Art AppreciationSpring 2025
ART 1301.002Honors Art AppreciationSpring 2025
ART 1301.003Honors Art AppreciationSpring 2025
ART 1300.001Art Appreciation for non art majorsFall 2024 Syllabus
ART 2370.423Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2024 Syllabus
ART 1301.001Honors Art AppreciationFall 2024 Syllabus
ART 1301.004Honors Art AppreciationFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ARTH 4814.001Theories of Contemporary ArtSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 4801.001Topics in Art HistorySummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1300.001Art Appreciation for non art majorsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 4815.001History of Interiors and Furniture IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.021Art History Survey ISummer 10W 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.027Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.028Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.021Art History Survey IISummer 10W 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.022Art Hist Survey IIISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.024Art History Survey ISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.029Art History Survey IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.034Art History Survey IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE