Skip to main content

Pamela Brekka

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Art History

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Florida, 2012
    Major: Art History

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 2370.022Art Hist Survey IIISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.022Art History Survey IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.023Art History Survey IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.023Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.024Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.026Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.022Art History Survey IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.022Art Hist Survey IIISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.023Art Hist Survey IIISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.020Art History Survey IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2370.026Art Hist Survey IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.030Art History Survey IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.031Art History Survey IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2360.023Art History Survey IIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE