Skip to main content

Pranay Prateek

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Texas at Dallas, 2018
    Major: Business Analytics
  • BE, Manipal Institute of Technology, 2011
    Major: Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BCIS 2610.006Introduction to Computers in BusinessSummer 5W1 2024 SPOT
BCIS 2610.009Introduction to Computers in BusinessSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BCIS 2610.001Introduction to Computers in BusinessFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BCIS 2610.006Introduction to Computers in BusinessSummer 5W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Prateek, P., Srivastava, S., Kim, D. (2022). The Role of Technological Advancement, and Social Justice in Alleviating the Negative Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic.
  • Srivastava, S., Prateek, P., Kim, D. (2022). When Social Media Foretells a Shooting. https://aisel.aisnet.org/treos_icis2022/16
  • Conference Proceeding

  • Srivastava, S., Prateek, P., Kim, D. (2022). When Social Media Foretells a Shooting. ICIS 2022 TREOs.
  • Prateek, P., Srivastava, S., Kim, D. (2022). The Role of Technological Advancement, and Social Justice in Alleviating the Negative Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic. Pre-ICIS Workshop: BIGS 2022.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE