Faculty Profile

Priyali Rajagopal

Priyali Rajagopal

Title
Associate Professor
Department
Marketing, Logistics, and Operations Management
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, The Ohio State University, 2004.
Major: Business
Degree Specialization: Marketing
PhD, The Ohio State University, 2004.
Major: Marketing
Degree Specialization: Cognitive Psychology
PGDip, Indian Institute of Management, 1994.
Major: Management
PGDM, Indian Institute of Management, 1994.
Major: General Management
BA, Narsee Monjee College, 1992.
Major: Commerce

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MKTG 4120.002, Consumer Behavior, Fall 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 6940.703, Individual Research, Fall 2020
MKTG 6900.711, Special Problems, Fall 2020 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MKTG 3660.001, Advertising Management, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 4120.501, Consumer Behavior, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 4120.002, Consumer Behavior, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 6900.703, Special Problems, Fall 2019
MKTG 6900.711, Special Problems, Fall 2019
MKTG 4120.002, Consumer Behavior, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 6900.712, Special Problems, Spring 2019
MKTG 4120.002, Consumer Behavior, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE