Skip to main content

Grace Wang

Title: Lecturer

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2007
    Major: Educational Psychology
    Dissertation: The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity And Fluency in Information Encoding
  • MS, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2003
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 1630.501General Psychology ISpring 2025
PSYC 3000.002Positive PsychologySpring 2025
PSYC 3000.501Positive PsychologySpring 2025
PSYC 2317.501Quantitative MethodsSpring 2025
PSYC 3650.501Experimental MethodsFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 3650.551Experimental MethodsFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 3000.001Positive PsychologyFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 3100.002Social PsychologyFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 1630.900General Psychology ISummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3000.002Positive PsychologySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3000.501Positive PsychologySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 2317.501Quantitative MethodsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.551Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3650.501Experimental MethodsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3650.551Experimental MethodsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3100.001Social PsychologyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE