Skip to main content

Rumana Akther

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, East Texas A&M University, 2025
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1650.430Pre CalculusSummer 10W 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1100.740AlgebraSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.700Business CalculusSpring 8W2 2026 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.770College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.741Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2026 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.772Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2026 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.773Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2026 Syllabus
MATH 1190.700Business CalculusFall 8W2 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Petrus-Nihi, E.F., Akther, R., Sirakov, N.M. (2026). Image Features and Image Dataset Augmentation for Skin Lesions Machine Learning Classification. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 350-361. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-08384-5_29
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE