Regina Oyesanya
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
Certificate, The George Washington University, 2018
Major: Medical Laboratory Sciences
-
PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2009
Major: Biochemistry
-
BS, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, 2002
Major: Environmental Management and Toxicology
Current Scheduled Teaching
| BIOL 1710.002 | Biology for Science Majors I | Spring 2026 | ||
| BIOL 1710.501 | Biology for Science Majors I | Spring 2026 | ||
| BIOL 3510.501 | Cell Biology | Spring 2026 | ||
| BIOL 1710.501 | Biology for Science Majors I | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| BIOL 3451.501 | Genetics | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| BIOC 3621.501 | Principles of Biochemistry | Fall 2025 | Syllabus |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
| BIOL 1710.002 | Biology for Science Majors I | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BIOL 1710.501 | Biology for Science Majors I | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BIOL 3510.501 | Cell Biology | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BIOL 3451.501 | Genetics | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BIOC 3621.501 | Principles of Biochemistry | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was