Skip to main content

Ryan C. Redmond

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of California, Davis, 2020
    Major: Linguistics
    Specialization: Sociolinguistics
    Dissertation: Herbivore in the Streets: A Participant Observation Approach to Hybrid Masculinity Performance and the Linguistic Practices of Underground Male Idols in Japan
  • BA, Texas A&M University, 2012
    Major: Spanish

Current Scheduled Teaching

JAPN 2040.001Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2025
JAPN 2040.002Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2025
JAPN 1010.003Elementary JapaneseFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

JAPN 2040.001Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2040.002Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2040.001Intermediate JapaneseFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2040.002Intermediate JapaneseFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2050.001Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2050.002Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2050.003Intermediate JapaneseSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2040.002Intermediate JapaneseFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2040.003Intermediate JapaneseFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 2050.001Intermediate JapaneseFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1020.001Elementary JapaneseSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1020.002Elementary JapaneseSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1020.003Elementary JapaneseSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1020.006Elementary JapaneseSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1010.002Elementary JapaneseFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1010.003Elementary JapaneseFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
JAPN 1010.006Elementary JapaneseFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Redmond, R.C. (2017). Speaking of sexuality: Analyzing [s] as an index of speaker identity in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 142 (4) 2583-2583. Acoustical Society of America (ASA). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5014452
  • Redmond, R.C. (2016). Constructing boyishness: A sociophonetic analysis of Japanese anime voice actresses performing male roles. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 140 (4) 3402-3402. Acoustical Society of America (ASA). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4970920
  • Book Review

  • Redmond, R.C. (2021). Review of Baker & Balirano (2018): Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture. Other. 10 (1) 93-96. John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jls.00018.red
  • Conference Proceeding

  • Redmond, R. (2016). ボーイズラブマンガにおけるセクシュアリティと役割語―Linguistic Identity in Japanese Boys’ Love Manga―. 役割語・キャラクター言語研究国際ワークショップ2015報告論集 138-150. 大阪大学.
  • Journal Article

  • Redmond, R.C. (2021). Sounds Like Misogyny: Voicing Cross-gender Roles in Anime and Discourses Surrounding Female Fandom on 2channel. Other. 13 (2) 102. University of Minnesota Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5749/mech.13.2.0102
  • Redmond, R.C. (2019). Kanji and non-homophonous furigana: Foreign language readings and character (stereo)types in manga. Other. 32 100323. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100323

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Redmond, R., "Stanford Inter-University Center Language Study Fellowship," sponsored by Shoyu Club of Japan, International, $33000 Funded. (2014 - 2015).
  • Grant - Research

  • Redmond, R., "JSPS Postdoctoral Research Fellowship," sponsored by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, International, $17000 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE