Skip to main content

Rebecca C. Werts

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas,
    Major: Counselor Education
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Clinical Mental Health Counseling
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 3640.002Group Process in Helping RelationshipsSpring 2025
COUN 3620.002Principles of Counseling IISpring 2025
COUN 2610.001PRIN COUNSELING IFall 2024 Syllabus
COUN 3620.001Principles of Counseling IIFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 3620.001Principles of Counseling IIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
COUN 3620.002Principles of Counseling IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
COS 1100.005Science Success SeminarFall 2019 Syllabus
COS 1100.007Science Success SeminarFall 2019 Syllabus
UCRS 1100.008Application of Learning FoundationsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Werts, R.C., "Minority Doctoral Fellow," sponsored by National Board for Certified Counselors Foundation (NBCCF), National, $20000 Funded. (2022 - 2023).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE