Skip to main content

Reagan Dickson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2024
    Major: Counseling
  • BS, East Texas Baptist University, 2020
    Major: Biology
    Specialization: Human Biology

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 3620.001Principles of Counseling IIFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 2600.001Culture Centered Social and Emotional Learning in the SchoolsFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
COUN 2600.003Culture Centered Social and Emotional Learning in the SchoolsFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
COUN 2600.005Culture Centered Social and Emotional Learning in the SchoolsFall 8W2 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    posted-content

  • Lemberger-Truelove, M.E., Li, D., Kim, H., Hill, D.D., Dickson, R., Kang, Z. (2025). School Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Relevant Moderators. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.2355.v1
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE