Skip to main content

Ranran Fan

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Studio Art

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, University of New Mexico, 2022
    Major: Art Studio

Current Scheduled Teaching

ASTU 3703.501Intermediate New Media: Creative CodingSpring 2025
ASTU 4700.501Senior New Media StudioSpring 2025
ASTU 5001.501Graduate SeminarFall 2024
ASTU 3703.501Intermediate New Media: Creative CodingFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ASTU 3703.501Intermediate New Media: Creative CodingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 4700.501Senior New Media StudioSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 5900.709Special ProblemsSpring 2024
ASTU 3703.501Intermediate New Media: Creative CodingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 3704.501Intermediate New Media: Performance and Electronic MediaFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Fan, R. (2022). Artist Spotlight. Hemisphere: Visual Cultures of the Americas, Vol. 14. 14 73. Hemisphere: Visual Cultures of the Americas.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE