Skip to main content

Robby J. Goodhue

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Behavior Analysis

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Behavior Analysis
    Dissertation: Exploring the Efficacy of Percentile Schedules with the Amplitude of Muscular Contractions
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Applied Behavior Analysis
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BEHV 2300.002Behavior Principles IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles ISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.002Behavior Principles ISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles IFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.002Behavior Principles IFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.200Behavior Principles IFall 2020
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles ISummer 5W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles ISpring 2020
BEHV 2300.002Behavior Principles ISpring 2020 Syllabus
BEHV 2300.002Behavior Principles IFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles ISpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2700.001Behavior Principles IISpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2300.001Behavior Principles IFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 2700.001Behavior Principles IIFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE