Skip to main content

Ryan K. Boettger

Title: Chair

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Certificate, The Pennsylvania State University, 2015
    Major: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
  • PhD, Texas Tech University, 2008
    Major: Technical Communication and Rhetoric
    Dissertation: Making the Case for Explicit Teaching: An Empirical Approach to Evaluating a Genre-Centered Pedagogy
  • MA, Texas Tech University, 2004
    Major: Technical Communication
  • BA, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 2002
    Major: Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 4010.001AI and Automation in Technical CommunicationSpring 2025 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 5170.401Grants and ProposalsFall 8W2 2024 SPOT
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
TECM 4900.001Special ProblemsFall 2023
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsSpring 8W1 2023 SPOT
TECM 4900.002Special ProblemsSpring 2023
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2022 SPOT
TECM 5170.801Grants and ProposalsSummer 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4180.005Advanced Technical CommunicationSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5180.301Professional WritingSpring 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5170.601Grants and ProposalsFall 8W2 2021
TECM 5170.801Grants and ProposalsFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
TECM 5550.601Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2021 SPOT
TECM 5550.805Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2021 Syllabus
TECM 5170.301Grants and ProposalsSpring 8W2 2021 SPOT
TECM 5170.311Grants and ProposalsSpring 8W2 2021 SPOT
TECM 5550.301Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationSpring 8W1 2021
TECM 4180.004Advanced Technical CommunicationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4180.070Advanced Technical CommunicationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4500.001Content Analysis in Technical CommunicationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5900.701Special ProblemsFall 2020
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationSummer 8W2 2020 SPOT
TECM 4500.001Content Analysis in Technical CommunicationFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5900.701Special ProblemsFall 2019
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5550.805Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2019
TECM 4920.702Cooperative Education in Technical CommunicationSummer 10W 2019
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationSpring 8W1 2019 SPOT
TECM 5550.811Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationSpring 8W1 2019 SPOT
TECM 4500.001Content Analysis in Technical CommunicationFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4900.010Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2018
TECM 5550.801Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationSummer 8W2 2018 SPOT
TECM 5185.001Principles of Technical CommunicationFall 8W2 2017 SPOT
TECM 5550.001Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2017 SPOT
TECM 5195.001Editing Technical DocumentsSpring 2017 SPOT
TECM 4900.701Special ProblemsSpring 2017
TECM 4800.001Topics in Technical and Professional CommunicationSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5550.001Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 8W1 2016 SPOT
TECM 4100.001Writing Grants and ProposalsFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.003Technical WritingSummer 5W1 2016 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.008Technical WritingSummer 5W2 2016 SPOT
TECM 5195.001Editing Technical DocumentsSpring 2016 SPOT
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsSpring 2016 SPOT
TECM 5185.001Principles of Technical CommunicationFall 2015 SPOT
TECM 5550.001Studies in the Teaching of Technical CommunicationFall 2015 SPOT
TECM 4190.004Technical EditingFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.001Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingSummer 5W1 2015 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsSpring 2015
TECM 5180.001Professional WritingSpring 2015
TECM 5175.001Writing in Professional SettingsFall 2014
TECM 4700.001Writing in the SciencesFall 2014 Syllabus
TECM 4250.001Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsSummer 5W1 2014 Syllabus
TECM 5195.001Editing Technical DocumentsSpring 2014
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsSpring 2013
TECM 5185.001Principles of Technical CommunicationFall 2012
TECM 4100.001Writing Grants and ProposalsFall 2012 Syllabus
TECM 5195.001Editing Technical DocumentsSpring 2012
TECM 5170.001Grants and ProposalsSpring 2012
TECM 4900.701Special ProblemsSpring 2012
TECM 5185.001Principles of Technical CommunicationFall 2011
TECM 5195.001Editing Technical DocumentsSpring 2011
TECM 4190.003Technical EditingSpring 2011 Syllabus
TECM 5180.001Professional WritingFall 2010
TECM 4190.001Technical EditingFall 2010 Syllabus
TECM 4190.003Technical EditingFall 2010 Syllabus
ENGL 4190.001Technical EditingSpring 2010
ENGL 4190.001Technical EditingFall 2009
ENGL 4190.003Technical EditingFall 2009
ENGL 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2009

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Boettger, R.K. (2019). "How does that make you feel?": The psychological dimensions of editorial comments. Other. Editing in the Modern Classroom. 47-65. Routledge.
  • Conference Proceeding

  • Lam, C.Y., Boettger, R.K. (2017). An overview of research methods in technical communication journals (2012–2016). Other. 4. IEEE.
  • Friess, E., Campbell, K.S., Boettger, R.K., Lam, C.Y. (2017). Are we missing the boat? A roundtable discussion on research methods and how they define the field. IEEE International Professional Communication Society (ProComm).
  • Boettger, R.K., Lam, C.Y., Palmer, L. (2017). Improving the data information literacies of technical communication undergraduates. Other. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
  • Friess, E., Boettger, R.K. (2016). Extended abstract: The presence of professionalism in technical communication: Views from industry and the academy. 2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2016.7740485
  • Boettger, R.K., Wulff, S. (2016). Using authentic language data to teach discipline-specific writing patterns to STEM students. Other. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2016.7740513
  • Boettger, R.K., Friess, E., Carliner, S. (2015). Update to who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996-2013). 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2015.7235812
  • Boettger, R.K., Friess, E. (2014). What are the most common title words in technical communication publications?. 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2014.7020350
  • Boettger, R.K., Friess, E., Carliner, S. (2014). Who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996-2013). 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2014.7020398
  • R.K Boettger. (2011). "Examining Error in the Technical Communication Editing Test." Proceedings of the 58th Annual Technical Communication Summit, Sacramento, California: 142-147.
  • Journal Article

  • Campbell, K.S., Boettger, R.K., Swisher, V. (2024). Challenges in developing technical communication leaders in client-based, content strategy projects: A teaching case. Technical Communication. 71 (3) 26-43. Society for Technical Communication.
  • Friess, E., Boettger, R. (2021). Identifying commonalities and divergences between technical communication scholarly and trade publications (1996–2017). Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 35 (4) 407-432.
  • Boettger, R.K., Friess, E. (2020). Content and authorship patterns in technical communication journals (1996–2017)—A quantitative content analysis. Technical Communication. 67 (3) 5-25.
  • Boettger, R.K., Wulff, S. (2019). Gender effects in student technical writing – a corpus-based study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 62 (3) 239-252.
  • Boettger, R.K., Moore, L.E. (2018). Analyzing error perception and recognition among professional communication practitioners and academics. Other. 81 (4) 462-484.
  • Boettger, R.K., Friess, E. (2016). Academics are from Mars, practitioners are from Venus: Analyzing content alignment within technical communication forums. Technical Communication. 63 (4) 314-327. Society for Technical Communication.
  • Boettger, R.K. (2014). Explicitly teaching five technical genres to English first-language adults in a multi-major technical writing course. Journal of Writing Research. 6 (1) 29-59. Gert Rijlaarsdam/SIG Writing. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.01.2
  • R.K. Boettger. (2014). The technical communication editing test: Three studies on this assessment type. Technical Communication. 61 (4) 215-231. Society for Technical Communication.
  • Boettger, R.K., Wulff, S. (2014). The naked truth about the naked 'this': Investigating grammatical prescriptivism in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly. 23 (2) 115-140. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.803919
  • Boettger, R.K., Lam, C.Y. (2013). An Overview of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Technical Communication Journals (1992–2011). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 56 (4) 272-293. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2013.2287570
  • R.K. Boettger. (2012). "Types of Errors Used in Medical Editing Tests." American Medical Writers Association Journal (27)3: 99-104.
  • R.K. Boettger & L.A. Palmer. (2010). "Quantitative Content Analysis: Its Use in Technical and Professional Communication." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (53)4: 346-357..
  • R.K. Boettger. (2010). "Rubric Use in Technical Communication: Exploring the Process of Creating Valid and Reliable Assessment Tools." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (53)1: 4-17..
  • Special Issue Introduction

  • Boettger, R., Ishizaki, S. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Data-driven approaches to research and teaching in professional and technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 61 (4) 352-355.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Boettger, R.K. (Principal), Wulff, S. (Principal), Hoeinghaus, D.J. (Co-Principal), Roberts, A.P. (Co-Principal), "Collaborative research: Evaluating a data-driven approach to teaching technical writing to STEM majors," sponsored by National Science Foundation, Federal, $290768 Funded. (2017 - 2020).
  • Boettger, R.K. (Principal), "A corpus-driven analysis of STEM students' technical vocabularies," sponsored by Research Enabling Grant, University of North Texas, $3700 Funded. (2013 - 2014).
  • Hoeinghaus, D.J. (Co-Principal), Boettger, R.K. (Principal), Ludi, S.A. (Co-Principal), "Collaborative Research: Evaluating a Data-Driven Approach to Teaching Technical Writing to STEM Majors," sponsored by National Science Foundation, FED, Funded. (2017 - 2020).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE