Skip to main content

Russell Luna

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mayborn School of Journalism

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of Memphis, 2015
    Major: Journalism
  • BS, Middle Tennessee State University, 2009
    Major: Electronic Media Communications Journalism

Current Scheduled Teaching

JOUR 4355.001Sport Media RelationsSpring 2026
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismSpring 2026
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

JOUR 4355.001Sport Media RelationsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADVG 3500.001Advertising Media Buying and PlanningSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 3040.001Advertising Media StrategySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 4350.001Sports JournalismFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 4350.501Sports JournalismFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE