Skip to main content

Rhonda Lewis

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, Texas Tech University, 2015
    Major: Higher Education
    Specialization: Community College Administration
    Dissertation: Community College Faculty Perceptions of Web-Based Instruction and Its Impact on Student Completion in Developmental Math Courses
  • MEd, University of Arkansas Monticello, 2002
    Major: Secondary Education
    Specialization: Education/English
  • BA, University of Arkansas Monticello, 2000
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.403First Year Writing ISpring 2025
ENGL 1310.404First Year Writing ISpring 2025
ENGL 1310.406First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.407First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.408First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.501First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.502First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.501First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.502First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.703First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.704First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.705First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.218First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.235First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.501First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TSIW 1300Z.218Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023 Syllabus
TSIW 1300Z.235Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.035College Writing IFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE