Skip to main content

Robert L. Penn

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MJ, University of North Texas, 2011
    Major: Journalism
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Journalism - Advertising

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.402Technical WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
TECM 2700.425Technical WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.424Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 3550.001Content Strategy in Technical CommunicationSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.326Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.824Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.825Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.320Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.321Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.812Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.814Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.008Technical WritingSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.305Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.306Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.808Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.813Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.814Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE