Skip to main content

Richard N. Hadwick

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, California Southern University, 2017
    Major: Psychology
    Specialization: Sport Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2025
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportSpring 2025
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerFall 2024 Syllabus
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3260.001Coaching Youth SportFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerSpring 2020 Syllabus
KINE 2240.001Coaching SoccerFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE