Skip to main content

Taylor T. Jones

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1680.360Elementary Probability and StatisticsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.361Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2023
UGMT 1300.362Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2023
MATH 1720.410Calculus IIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1780.001Probability ModelsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1780.001Probability ModelsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2730.001Multivariable CalculusSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.200Calculus ISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.201Calculus ISpring 2021
MATH 2000.003Discrete MathematicsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.130Calculus IISpring 2020 Syllabus
MATH 1720.131Calculus IISpring 2020
MATH 1720.132Calculus IISpring 2020
MATH 1720.133Calculus IISpring 2020
MATH 1190.002Business CalculusFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Allaart, P.C., Jackson, S.C., Jones, R.T., Lambert, D. (2023). On the existence of numbers with matching continued fraction and decimal expansions. Monatshefte für Mathematik. 202 (1) 1-30.
  • Allaart, P., Jones, R.T. (2023). Box-counting dimension and differentiability of box-like statistically self-affine functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 521 (2) Article 126909, 20 pages.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE