Skip to main content

Russell V. Silguero

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Behavior Analysis

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Behavior Analysis
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2010
    Major: Applied Behavior Analysis
  • BA, The University of Texas at Austin, 2006
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 4951.706Honors College Capstone ThesisFall 2023
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2020 Syllabus
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 3150.001Basic Behavior PrinciplesSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE