Skip to main content

Rongfang Zhan

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

PUBH 2010.400Epidemiological Concepts and Methods for Public HealthFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 3900.900Case Management in RehabilitationSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PUBH 2010.900Epidemiological Concepts and Methods for Public HealthFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.900Case Management in RehabilitationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.900Case Management in RehabilitationFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Zhan, R., Mpofu, E., Prybutok, G.L., Ingman, S.R. (2024). Social networking older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Systematic review protocol on their use of Information and Communication Technology. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302138. San Franscisco, CA, Public Library of Science.
  • Mpofu, E., Zhan, R., Yin, C., Brock, K. (2024). Qualities of older adults family and friendship relationships and their association with life satisfaction. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. NO. 49 (9) 15. MDPI.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE