Faculty Profile

Sensong An

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Electrical Engineering
College
College of Engineering

    

Education

PhD, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2021.
Major: Electrical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

EENG 3410.001, Engineering Electromagnetics, Fall 2024
EENG 3411.001, Engineering Electromagnetics Lab, Fall 2024

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

EENG 3410.001, Engineering Electromagnetics, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EENG 3411.001, Engineering Electromagnetics Lab, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EENG 3410.001, Engineering Electromagnetics, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Book Chapter
An, S. (2023). Deep Learning for Metasurfaces and Metasurfaces for Deep Learning. 319-343. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Conference Proceeding
An, S. (2023). Deep-learning designed fabrication-friendly metasurfaces. FTu1E. 3. Optica Publishing Group. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=fio-2023-FTu1E.3
An, S. (2023). LWIR metalenses for broadband, wide-angle imaging. FW5G. 1. Optica Publishing Group.
An, S. (2023). Wide field-of-view long-wave infrared metalenses. 12530, 102-109. SPIE. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/12530/125300I/Wide-field-of-view-long-wave-infrared-metalenses/10.1117/12.2661943.short
An, S. (2023). A Fully 3D-Printed Flexible Millimeter-Wave Doppler Radar. 335-338. IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10188080/
An, S. (2023). Data Collection and Network Design for Deep Learning Based Metasurface Design. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10114751
Journal Article
An, S. (2023). Photochemically Engineered Large‐Area Arsenic Sulfide Micro‐Gratings for Hybrid Diffractive–Refractive Infrared Platforms. 5(1), 2300241. Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adpr.202300241
An, S. (2023). Design of continuously tunable varifocal metalenses. Journal of Optics. 25(11), 115102. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2040-8986/acfbe8/meta
An, S. (2023). Dual-band optical collimator based on deep-learning designed, fabrication-friendly metasurfaces. 12(17), 3491-3499. De Gruyter.
An, S. (2023). Wide field-of-view metalens: a tutorial. 5(3), 033001-033001. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/advanced-photonics/volume-5/issue-3/033001/Wide-field-of-view-metalens-a-tutorial/10.1117/1.AP.5.3.033001.short
An, S. (2023). Understanding wide field-of-view flat lenses: an analytical solution. Optics Letters. Chinese Optical Society. https://opg.optica.org/col/abstract.cfm?uri=col-21-2-023601
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE