Skip to main content

Stephen Lochbaum

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MM, University of Vicotira, 2005
    Major: Guitar performance

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1527.705GUITARSpring 2016 SPOT
MUAC 3527.705GUITARSpring 2016 SPOT
MUAM 3527.705GuitarSpring 2016 SPOT
MUAS 1527.705GuitarSpring 2016 SPOT
MUAC 1527.705GUITARFall 2015 SPOT
MUAC 3527.705GUITARFall 2015 SPOT
MUAM 3527.705GuitarFall 2015 SPOT
MUAC 1527.705GUITARSpring 2015
MUAC 3527.705GUITARSpring 2015
MUAM 1527.705GuitarSpring 2015
MUAM 3527.705GuitarSpring 2015
MUAS 1527.705GuitarSpring 2015
MUAG 4360.003Instrumental Pedagogy and RepertoireSpring 2015 Syllabus
MUAC 1527.705GUITARFall 2014
MUAC 3527.705GUITARFall 2014
MUAM 1527.705GuitarFall 2014
MUAS 1527.705GuitarFall 2014
MUCM 3621.500Guitar EnsembleFall 2014
MUEN 5621.500String EnsemblesFall 2014
MUAC 1527.705GUITARSpring 2014
MUAC 3527.705GUITARSpring 2014
MUAS 1527.705GuitarSpring 2014
MUAC 1527.705GUITARFall 2013
MUAC 3527.705GUITARFall 2013
MUAM 1527.705GuitarFall 2013
MUAC 1527.705GUITARSpring 2013
MUAC 3527.705GUITARSpring 2013
MUAS 1527.705GuitarSpring 2013
MUAC 1527.705GUITARFall 2012
MUAC 5527.705GUITARFall 2012
MUAS 1527.705GuitarFall 2012
MUAC 1527.705GUITARSpring 2012
MUAS 1527.705GuitarSpring 2012
MUAC 1527.705GUITARFall 2011
MUAS 1527.705GuitarFall 2011
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE