Skip to main content

Shannon Coates

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Florida, 2016
    Major: Educational Leadership

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RESM 3450.901Diversity and Inclusion in Recreation, Event, and Sport OrganizationsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
RESM 4160.501Assessment and Data Analytics in Recreation, Event, and Sport OrganizationsFall 2023 SPOT
RESM 4150.001Professional Development and Capstone Experience in Leisure, Sport and Welness Related Professions.Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Walker, J.T., Coates, S. (2021). Incorporating the conference into the professional development/capstone class experience. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies & Recreation Education. 36 (2) 2. New York, Taylor and Francis. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ujle20/current
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE