Skip to main content

Syd Coppersmith

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of Pittsburgh, 1984
    Major: English
  • BA, Carnegie - Mellon University, 1980
    Major: English - Professional Writing

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.001Technical WritingSummer 5W1 2025
TECM 2700.002Technical WritingSummer 5W2 2025
TECM 4100.001Proposal WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
TECM 2700.004Technical WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
TECM 2700.018Technical WritingSpring 2025 Syllabus
TECM 4250.001Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsSpring 2025 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 1700.002Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.003Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.009Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.001Technical WritingSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.004Technical WritingSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.001Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.005Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.014Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.016Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.003Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.009Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.038Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE