Skip to main content

Setareh Daneshgar

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Supply Chain Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

LSCM 3960.001Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementSummer 5W2 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LSCM 3960.002Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
OPSM 3830.002Operations ManagementFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 3960.001Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 3960.005Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 3960.004Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Daneshgar, S., Niranjan, S., Garg, V. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Mental Features on Distracted Driving Across Age Groups. Other.

    • Journal Article

  • Daneshgar, S. (2020). Designing a multi-period production-distribution system considering social responsibility aspects and failure modes. Sustainable Production and Consumption.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE