Skip to main content

Stephanie D. Ware

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • AUD, University of North Texas, 2012
    Major: Audiology
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2008
    Major: Speech-Language Pathology/Audiology

Current Scheduled Teaching

ASLP 4045.400Basic Rehabilitative AudiologyFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ASLP 3040.900Introduction to AudiologyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 4045.900Basic Rehabilitative AudiologySummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 3040.900Introduction to AudiologyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 4045.900Basic Rehabilitative AudiologySummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 4045.900Basic Rehabilitative AudiologySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 3040.900Introduction to AudiologyFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 3030.001Speech and Hearing SciencesSpring 2020 Syllabus
ASLP 3040.001Introduction to AudiologyFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6800.001Rehabilitative Audiology: AdultsFall 2017 SPOT
SPHS 3030.003Speech and Hearing SciencesFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
SPHS 6780.003Electrophysiologic Assessment IISpring 2016 SPOT
SPHS 6670.002Medical AudiologySpring 2016 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE